Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Literary Epistle: Odyssey 18-24


28 February 2017

Sophomore English
Room US028

 

Dear Students:

In books 18-24, the last part of “Odysseus on Ithaca,” both the patterns of the Odyssey and the arc of the story come full circle. In fact, we see Homer bring things to completion through the convergence of all the individual patterns into the complex tapestry, the Pattern of patterns, that we call "the story."

Coming of Age (Andra) We find several comments in these final books about Telemachus’ entry into manhood. One typical remark occurs in Book 19. As Odysseus in disguise finally speaks to Penelope face-to-face, he says, “’No women’s wildness here in the house / escapes the prince’s eye. He’s come of age at last’” (95-6). Telemachus’ actions in these books also reflect his maturity. Not the least of these would be the assistance he gives his father in the battle with the suitors. We also see him become nearly equal to Odysseus, his father’s true son, in Book 24, when Telemachus, Odysseus, and Laertes prepare to fight the suitors’ relatives.

Bards How is a man with a bow like a bard? The simile that Homer uses to describe Odysseus’s stringing of the great bow at the end of Book 21 evokes that question. The choice of this comparison suggests some intriguing connections between bards and archers, not the least of which is that they both deal out pain and hardship with their instruments. Hence, when the bard is at his best, his song causes us to weep, but to weep in such a way that it heals us. Apollo, the archer god, is also the god of song and the god of healing. Further, the final showdown with the suitors takes place on a feast day honoring Apollo and is executed mainly with Apollo's own weapon, as Odysseus's bow may literally once have been. It is also intriguing that it takes a bard, Phemius, to bring Odysseus to restrain himself and to show mercy, effectively bringing to an end the slaughter of the suitors, when he grabs Odysseus's knees and pleads to be spared.

Identity These books feature key recognition or discovery scenes: Eurycleia’s discovery of Odysseus’s scar in Book 19 and Odysseus’s announcement of his true identity to the suitors just after he slays Antinous in Book 22. The first, significantly, leads to the long digression that reveals the meaning of Odysseus’s name, given to him by his maternal grandfather Autolycus: “’so let his name be Odysseus. . . / the Son of Pain, a name he’ll earn in full’” (463-4). When he receives a wound from a boar on Parnassus (the mountain where the Muses live), he begins to earn his name. But the moment when he truly owns his name comes when he slaughters the suitors in his hall, just after he’s revealed that name to them. Notice the contrast between this moment of revelation and the one Odysseus reports in Book 9 when he calls out his name to the Cyclops. Whereas that moment results from a reckless impulse, Odysseus has carefully prepared for the revelation of his identity in Book 22 to take place at just the right moment. Finally, in Book 23, Odysseus dispels Penelope’s doubts about his identity by revealing the secret of their marriage bed: One post consists of an olive tree still rooted in the earth, a symbol of the vitality of their marriage. Sharing his pain, Penelope completes Odysseus’s identity as neither Circe nor Calypso could.

Nostos and Xenia  Again, the clearest moment of recognition for Odysseus is when he begins the battle for his home. When he reasserts mastery over his house and family, Odysseus can strip away all disguises. He reveals himself here because protecting his household involves protecting and preserving who he is and what he has become through his hardships and travels: the paragon of wisdom and self-command who has learned to control his belly. The suitors have violated the practice of hospitality by lawlessly disrupting the peace of Odysseus’s home and family. Since home, providing for the balanced satisfaction of the belly’s appetites, represents the place where human life can flourish, the suitors have outraged both the gods and men. In fact, by transgressing against xenia (hospitality), they’ve threatened the very order of the universe that Homer depicts in the tale. Zeus protects strangers and suppliants by consecrating the practice of hospitality because men who are away from home as they often are in Homer's world face the threat of losing their humanity and reverting to the level of beasts in the satisfaction of their appetites. Hospitality counters that danger by providing a substitute for home.  

Recklessness and Restraint Homer may be the first great sage of western culture to correlate self-control to wisdom. Since Odysseus’s return to Ithaca in Book 13, we have seen him exercising what we might call heroic self-restraint. In his own house, Odysseus suffers the abuses the suitors pour out on him when he’s disguised as a beggar. Odysseus must also resist revealing his identity to Penelope, especially when they talk face-to-face in Book 19. All of the effort that Odysseus puts into controlling his impulses is a sign of foresight, looking ahead to the possible consequences of making certain choices and performing certain actions. Significantly, when Eurycleia discovers the scar that identifies Odysseus, it happens in Penelope’s presence. One nuance about recklessness in the story might escape notice. Controlling recklessness does not mean endless restraint. There comes a time for release as well. In his epic, Homer dramatizes the importance of knowing when to maintain and when to relax tension as a safeguard against recklessness. As both Menelaus and Alcinous point out, “Balance is best in all things.” However, a question remains as to how thoroughly Odysseus masters himself or, indeed, whether anyone can ever achieve perfect self-control. In Book 24, when Odysseus violates Athena’s command and continues to attack the suitors’ relatives, Zeus has to intervene by dropping a thunderbolt at Athena’s feet to rein him in. It seems that Odysseus needs to make one more journey to polish his great, yet still imperfect, ability to practice self-restraint. And another journey is pending. Perhaps Odysseus’s relapse into recklessness here explains the unfinished business of his final journey to appease Poseidon. On his earlier journey home from Troy, he received an education that turned him from recklessness. But that education, it seems, won't be completed until he has restored complete harmony with the gods by spreading Poseidon's worship to a place in which the Sea God is unknown.

Since ancient times, some scholars have posited that Book 24 was not originally part of Homer’s poem but a later addition. They argue that Odysseus’s reunion with Penelope gives a fitting resolution to the story. Still, Book 24 does wrap up some other loose ends neatly. In it, Homer returns us to the Kingdom of the Dead for one final look at the suitors and at Achilles and Agamemnon fully reconciled to each other in death (thus bringing the story cycle begun in the Iliad to completion). He shows us Odysseus’s reunion with Laertes and disposes of the confrontation between Odysseus and the suitors’ relatives. With the intervention of Zeus and Athena, Book 24 echoes the opening sequence on Olympus in Book 1, with this difference: Zeus and Athena are now clearly allies in the cause of restoring peace and prosperity to Odysseus and to Ithaca.

I hope that’s helpful. What do you think?

Autonomously yours,

Dr. Carlson




P.S. I intentionally did not comment on one of the major patterns of the story: God-mortal interaction. In your responses to this epistle, I would like for you to offer your thoughts on how Homer brings this pattern full circle and weaves it into the other patterns at the conclusion of the story. Do this instead of the usual three takeaways and a question.


 

 

 

 

 

18 comments:

  1. I agree that the latter half of the story has brought Andra full circle. Shortly after Telemachus returns, he is put to the test with the suitors. He is finally able to stand alongside Odysseus in battling the suitors, a stark comparison to the beginning of the book where he was simply pushed around.
    God mortal interaction doesn’t seem to undergo a large change, other than that it has become more direct in its use. While before Athena offered subtle guidance to individuals, here she is bestowing her power onto Odysseus directly, both in her disguise and her blessing in combat. Personally, it hasn’t seemed to evolve in much the same way as a few other patterns.
    While I’m not completely on board with the idea that book 24 was added later, I think that the inclusion of the underworld scene was a bit odd. It feels like a flashback, something that would be necessary if a large gap in time took place between tellings of the overall story.
    Why isn’t the belly comparison used more at the end of the book? I felt like there as a missed (or ignored by myself) opportunity for Odysseus to be portrayed as ‘sated’ after his slaughter.

    Paul Braymen

    ReplyDelete
  2. God-Mortal Interaction: Odysseus, Athena's champion in the war for Troy, finally reaches home and reclaims his throne at the end of Homer's Odyssey. Before that, Odysseus faces many gods who are both for and against him. Calypso imprisons Odysseus on her island for two decades and Poseidon attempts to get revenge on Odysseus for blinding his son, the cyclops. Zeus remains neutral, though he seems to favor Odysseus making his way home; Zeus may want Odysseus to defeat the suitors for disrespecting hospitality, which he governs over. Athena has always been on her champion's side since the war depicted in the Iliad. She guides Odysseus home and Telemachus on a journey to find his father. Athena meets with and plots the death of the suitors alongside Odysseus and Telemachus, to a lesser extent. And Athena is the God who finally puts an end to the fighting between Odysseus and the suitors' families.
    In this context, Poseidon and Calypso could represent recklessness, Zeus could represent Xenia, and Athena could represent both Xenia and Nostos.

    Max Henshaw

    ReplyDelete
  3. coming of age for Telemachus is finally resolved when Odysseus says that he is of age. it is interesting how the storytelling and healing relate to each other and how important the bard is in the Odyssey. God-mortal interaction is one of the most important aspects of this book. The Gods do to the mortals what they like and Athena really helps Odysseus on his journey and Telemachus come of age. If the bards songs makes you cry to heal you then how does Odysseus heal through his actions?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that God-Mortal interaction plays a huge role in this book. Because the Gods were the ones who first had Odysseus isolated on an island for 20 years, to learn from his mistakes. Then they had him go through many hardships before he could arrive home. I agree with your comments about andra in Telemachus, but also Odysseus because he does not repeat the same mistakes he'd made in the past. It is interesting how major of a rule the pattern of identity is near the end of the book. What makes people think that 24 was later added, was there evidence to support why the author would leave his readers with an incomplete ending?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Odysseus was on Calypso's island for seven years.

      Delete
  5. Luc Zelissen

    1. I think that it is true that Telemachus has come of age. He has risen up and now is fighting with his dad.
    2. Revealment and concealment of Identity in the last few books have been instrumental for the plot to kill the suitors.
    3. God-Mortal interaction between Odysseus and Athena has played a large role in justifying Odysseus's actions.
    4.How has Athena and Zues's relationship changed overtime?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 2. Let's call it revelation or discovery of identity, Luc.
      4. They begin in conflict (Book 1) and end as allies (Book 24).

      Delete
  6. The connection between bard and archer is interesting. Can an archer, like a bard, bring pain, but also happiness? God-mortal interaction plays a huge role in the Odyssey. There is no doubt that Odysseus would not have been able to do what he did without divine help. The thought that book 24 may be yet another unfortunate showing of Odysseus's recklessness is both sad and interesting. Is Odysseus doomed to another painful journey?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think that Telemachus's coming of age journey is finally over for the most part when Odysseus acknowledges that he is a man now when he speaks with Penelope. I agree with your statement that Telemachus and Odysseus are pretty much equals, shown during the battle with the suitors. God mortal interaction is used through out this book mostly as a way of describing how the gods treat and control the mortals. They seem to be used mostly for the gods own bidding. I am not sure what side I agree with in the book 24 dilemma, but I do agree that it does tie up some loose ends. I like how the book ends in a way with the same scene it opens with, Zeus and Athena have finally resolved their conflict. (athena's potential conflict with the other gods)

    Looking way back to the beginning of the book, why is Athena the only god that seems to care about Odysseus's struggle? Is she just the only god headstrong enough to possibly anger the other gods with this seemingly unimportant issue?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I believe that from Gmi, many other patterns stem from it such as anonymity or suffering. Gmi also seems to me to be the most frequent pattern in the story.

    I noticed how concealment and revealment of identity worked together in the end.

    It's interesting how not only one character demonstrated the pattern of recklessness, but many characters did.

    Q: is there any more evidence that Book 24 might've been a later addition?
    -DN

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's call it revelation or discovery of identity. "Revealment" is not a word--at least not yet.

      I think the main evidence is that some scholars think that another author was trying to tidy things up. There may be some other evidence of which I am not aware.

      Delete
  9. GMI: Throughout the book, God mortal interaction has been the most prominent pattern. Odysseus has been harmed, captured, and hated by a number of the gods throughout the story. Athena has consistently been helping Odysseus and Telemachus the entire time, just so Odysseus could return home, and once he does, retake his home. Athena's involvement finally comes full circle in the last books, when they have reached the goal Odysseus had been striving for for so long.

    Levi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's not forget that he has also been beloved of some goddesses, as well.

      Do you have a question about the epistle?

      Delete
  10. I agree that Andra has come to a full circle because in the beginning of the Odyssey Telemachus was wishing his father would come home so he could kick out all the suitors from his home. Athena had to come visit him and tell him to stop acting like a child and stand up for himself. In the end of the book Telemachus gets his chance to stand up to the suitors when he and his father attack them. I believe Odysseus has learned to have little more self-control and to be less reckless. When he first comes home he doesn't reveal his identity right away because he could have learned his lesson from when he revealed himself to the cyclops. But when Odysseus kills all the suitors it does seem like he had returned to his old ways but he just might have to learn more self-control. Along Odysseus' journey he has a lot of interaction with the gods. In the book god-mortal interaction has also come to a full circle. It begins with god-mortal interaction with Athena visiting Telemachus and helping his build up the confidence to confront the suitors. Along the way many of the gods have helped him get back home and some have tried to keep him from reaching home. Out of all the gods it seems Athena has helped Odysseus and Telemachus the most. She helps plot for Telemachus and Odysseus to kill the suitors and she also helped them both on their journeys. In the end it is Athena and Zeus who have to intervene for Odysseus to stop killing all the suitors and their families. Why did Penelope have doubts about whether the stranger was really Odysseus?

    Morgan

    ReplyDelete
  11. Homer takes god-mortal interaction into a full circle by including Athena in the very beginning of the story to the last page of the story. He also links god-mortal interaction with andra, or coming of age. He shows how Odysseus and Telemachus have come along since the beginning of the story. If Athena hadn’t helped Telemachus, he may not have made it home to Ithaca. And then he would have never gotten the chance to plan the suitors’ downfall and fight alongside his father. Odysseus shows a big part of his andra during the battle (which was encouraged by Athena) where, yes he killed all the suitors, but he had spared two people that he could have easily killed. This act shows that even in bloodthirst, Odysseus is able to control his limits. So the question is why was Athena the only god to intervene? Any god could have helped the suitors, and not Odysseus, if they wanted to, so why did only Athena help?

    ReplyDelete
  12. God-Mortal Interaction:
    From the beginning to the end, we have seen the gods constantly interact with their human subjects. For example, in the first few books of the Odyssey, Athena confronts Telemachus in order to urge him to find his father. From here, Athena continues to help Odysseus get home and help his family cope with the suitors. Homer ties up God-Mortal Interaction by having Athena end the fighting between Odysseus and the suitors families. She then told Odysseus that he needed to appease the anger of Poseidon.
    Do you think Homer was aware of any of these patterns that he was implementing?
    Samuel Levy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The way the patterns are used implies a certain level of awareness, but perhaps not the same kind of awareness that the alert readers or audiences would have once they had caught onto them. The author's awareness may have been more or a gut feeling than a fully realized concept. Does that make sense?

      Delete
  13. 1. Did the dispute between Athena and Zeus early in the story damage their relationship?

    2. I agree that Telemechus did become a man by the end of the Telemechy

    3. Concealment of identity was extremely prominent in the later books especially 19-22

    4. Odyesseus I believe became less reckless by the end of the stroy

    ReplyDelete